Production script · hard cap 2:00 — voice ends at ~1:52, end card to ~1:55 · Huy + Chris · Each scene is a module: what to say, what to shoot, what to edit · 🎬 Film by Sun 23 Aug (Week 1, Session 2) — details in Scoring & timing.
Real Bloomberg explainers are mostly voice-over — a narrator reading fast (~170 words/minute) while footage carries the screen. Your rubric grades the opposite: faces to camera, eye contact, body language, natural pace. So this is built like a Bloomberg anchor segment: your faces are the spine of the video (~80% of the runtime), and the cinematic layer — stat cards, B-roll inserts — flashes over your voice for 2–3 seconds at a time. Your voice never stops for footage. Only the opening stat card plays in silence.
It isn't short. It's calibrated. A newsreader does 170–180 words a minute; a clear, graded, face-to-camera ESL presentation runs ~140 words a minute with real pauses. Two minutes at that pace is ~260–280 spoken words — total, for both of you. This script is 262. If we wrote 350 words you would have to rush, and rushing loses the two easiest marks on the sheet: pace and pronunciation. Short on paper is exactly what full sounds like on camera.
| Scene | Time | Where to shoot | Who |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 · Cold open | 0:00–0:16 | Stat card → clean wall / campus | Chris |
| 2 · Why we left | 0:16–0:46 | At home — desk, warm lamp | Huy → Chris |
| 3 · Why Australia | 0:48–1:18 | Outdoors — campus / harbour | Huy → Chris |
| 4 · Design angle | 1:18–1:36 | At home — over Huy's design work | Huy solo |
| 5 · Outro | 1:36–1:55 | Same spot as cold open (bookend) | Chris → Huy |
Airtime: Huy ≈ 130 words · Chris ≈ 132 words — even, which is graded directly. Voice ends ~1:52; end card holds to ~1:55; you never touch the 2:00 cap.
Full-screen title cards in your editor — dark background, one huge number, small caption. Only the first is silent (3 s). The other two flash for ~1.5 s while the speaker keeps talking.
"This is why." lands, beat of silence, then the title card cuts in. That three-word setup is the whole hook — don't decorate it.
This is what separates your video from every other pair's generic "rankings + weather" answer. Specific, personal, only you can say it.
262 spoken words · voice ends ~1:52 · big text for practising and filming. Gold = the cause–effect connectors the rubric listens for. Faded = the two emergency trims if rehearsal runs long.
| Graded point | Where it's covered |
|---|---|
| Why abroad + why Australia, clearly | Scene 2 answers "why abroad"; scenes 3–4 answer "why Australia"; the outro states both in one breath. |
| Cause–effect language (because / as a result / therefore / due to) |
7 connectors split across both speakers — every gold underline. The whole video is one causal chain, which is exactly what Week 2's analysis session asks you to point at. |
| Equal speaking | Huy 130 words · Chris 132 words. |
| Confidence & engagement | Full passages instead of ping-pong one-liners; direct-to-lens delivery; the food beat and the non-speaker's reactions in scene 3. |
| Clear pronunciation | Drill list below. |
| Natural pace, pauses | ~140 wpm by construction; built-in pauses after "with honesty", "This is why.", and the two-second hold on "us, here". |
Say each five times, slowly, before filming:
This task has no Moodle submission, so the "deadline" is having the video ready to show in class. ALSW Weeks 1–2 Causality runs across your first two program weeks:
| What | When | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Film the video (Week 1 · Session 2, online) |
This week — by Sun 23 Aug 2026, end of Week 1 | ⚠️ The near deadline |
| Online module ≥ 65% (same session) |
With Session 2 — required for Week 1 attendance | Don't skip it |
| Analyse your own video (Week 2 · Session 1, in person) |
Week of 24–30 Aug 2026 | This page = your analysis |
| Live improved performance + peer feedback (Week 2 · Session 2, in person) |
Week of 24–30 Aug 2026 | The graded moment |